We have an elite team for the Wedding Dress Shop Security Camera in Newport Beach. Secure your business now by calling on Starlight, We will be able to offer you a solution adapted to your needs and your budget. In the event of a problem, our troubleshooters also intervene as quickly as possible for professional repair.
Our Wedding Dress Shop Security Camera In Newport Beach team offers you:
- Purchase solution in one or more regulations
- Rental service for surveillance camera and all video surveillance equipment with maintenance, assistance, movement and new replacement included
- After-sales service is available seven days a week.
- Quick repair: our troubleshooters and technicians are at your disposal
- Quotation for professionals and individuals free and within 24 hours, travel included
Contact Us for Wedding Dress Shop Security Camera In Newport Beach:
- Email: info@starlightcabling.com
- Phone: 949-434-4252
We have almost a decade of bright experience in affordable security camera installation in Anaheim– giving you the best levels of service, the best protection against theft and vandalism and amazing customer service 24/7.
- Expert installation of CCTV systems for both home and business
- Repairs and upgrades to existing camera systems
- Professional advice on crime reduction, security cameras.
Pros and cons of using surveillance cameras in public places
The alarming crime rates reinforce the idea that the traditional model of combating violence is anachronistic and ineffective.
Instead of “public safety”, our current situation reveals a real public “insecurity”.
Every day it becomes clearer that the standard of traditional policing has not given the answer that society expects and needs in the fight against street crime. In this context, new organizational concepts are sprouting and bringing a new understanding of public safety. From there, public safety ceases to be an exclusive police problem and involves the government and communities.
In this course, the role of the municipality is revitalized, since it begins to develop its ability to stimulate the community to exercise its social role in projects aimed at improving the quality of life and in partnership with public security. *Video monitoring as a deterrent
tool* In fact, we currently live under constant threat of attacks by armed criminals, and thus exposed to the health of all types of offenders.
To live more safely, we install security cameras inside and outside our homes. Then two questions arise: *Surveillance cameras should be placed in public places*?
*What are the advantages and disadvantages of video surveillance on public roads*?
Time and time again there are debates about whether surveillance cameras should be placed in public areas such as streets, shopping malls, schools, libraries, airports, clubs,
etc. Some people feel safer with the cameras, while other citizens and privacy advocates feel uncomfortable with the idea someone would be watching them every time they are in public. Big Brother syndrome? Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of using security cameras in public places and in the end we’ll see what prevails.
1. Video monitoring on public roads improves public safety*
When we install a home security camera, we increase the safety of the house. One of the main benefits of surveillance cameras in public spaces is the increased sense of security. Surveillance cameras on public roads help to stay safe while we have fun, buy, travel, go to work, to school, etc. Cameras can be used as a way to keep an eye on any criminal activity and even preparatory acts. Panoramic fisheye security cameras placed in public spaces, such as crossroads, parking lots, museums, concert halls, do an excellent job in capturing images with 360° coverage.
In addition, crimes can be deterred before they even begin in some
cases. If a person suspects individuals or materials out of context, in a particular area, the competent authorities may be contacted to work in the area before any damage occurs or the offence is committed. In addition, depending on the detection of irregular conducts by the analytical software anyone can be removed from the site as a precaution. When public safety is guaranteed, the fear of crime can be reduced, therefore the sense of security is high.
2. Surveillance cameras in public areas reduce crime
rates* It is common to use cameras in supermarkets and other stores, which not only catch criminals but prevent crimes from being committed. If an individual realizes that there is a surveillance camera in a certain area, he avoids committing a crime at that location for fear of being surprised. Statistics show that surveillance by cameras reduces crime. It is the embodying of the Economic Theory of Crime (Gary Becker-Nobel Prize for Economics 1992) that found that the mistest and opportunistic before perpetrating a crime, assess the costs (chances of being arrested and effective conviction) and the benefits (illicit profits) to be earned for their criminal adventure.
3. Video surveillance in public spaces helps
catch criminals* If a crime is committed in an area where a surveillance camera has been mounted, the chances of catching the criminal are much higher. Facial recognition software has improved a lot over the years, which means that if a person is caught committing a crime, the chances of being convicted are much higher. Posters can be created and images can be displayed on the television network to help spread the criminal’s face. Without CCTV footage, it can be extremely difficult to get a quality description of the element that committed the crime, even if there were eyewitnesses. The Boston Marathon Bombing is a good example( 3 dead and 264 injured, on 04/15/2013). It only took three days for the FBI to release photos (though not very sharp, but sufficient for identification) of the two suspects, taken by a surveillance camera installed in a department store.
4. Video cameras in public places provide evidence
and gather clues* Any footage that is on a surveillance camera that captures a criminal action being committed can be used in court as evidence against the accused. In some cases, if there is no footage, there will be little or no evidence to convict the perpetrator of the criminal offence and the individual may release himself or go to jail. These night vision security cameras perform well so thieves can be recognized, even if they have committed the crime in dark areas. In addition, in some cases, video surveillance footage can also help prove someone’s innocence if they have been charged with a crime they have not committed.
5. Video surveillance on the streets improves coexistence
for everyday life* Several cities have put cameras at traffic lights as a way to prevent people from going to or from overtaking the red light. Moreover, the competent authorities can monitor the conditions of highways, streets and avenues with the aforementioned surveillance cameras. Thus, they can generate real-time traffic reports, helping people choose the right time and public route for travel. *Pro 6 – Facilitates the mapping and identification of the criminal,
as well as the iter criminis and escape route* Because, it is known that many of the acts of preparation of the crime are carried out indoor, to sorrelfa, the actions immediately prior to the attack, the intrusion is always in places that can be monitoring, such as building gatehouses, surroundings,
vicunas roads etc., from the video-monitoring it is possible to identify the mediates, used vehicles, any bandits that are supporting, etc. Similarly, in the escape will also be feasible the same detection controls, cited in preparatory acts. *The “Cons” of using security cameras
in public places* *Against 1.
Security cameras in public violate the privacy
rights* The first argument against video surveillance in public spaces is the invasion of privacy. When you are walking down the street, driving your car, or dating boyfriends and girlfriends, you will be monitored with cameras placed on public roads. This would create an invasive situation in an individual’s private life. The claim is that everyone would have situations of private life, that they don’t want others or the government to know.
2. Surveillance systems are easily abused*
Some trials discuss the use of surveillance cameras in public places showing that cameras can be used abusively. An example of how a camera can be misused is that information gathered by the police can be used as a form of blackmail.
Another form of abuse is voyeurism.
Spying on women using surveillance cameras is quite common in areas where these cameras were installed. This is a problem that needs to be solved.
Overall, the simple lack of control or limits in camera use is one of the biggest problems.
It is worth noting here that today it is possible to track whether a particular vigilante would be used long-range cameras, such as speed-domes to invade someone’s privacy or if crooks dressed as police officers use third-party videos, criminally.
The best option for external monitoring is bullet cameras that are not capable of joystick or remote movement.
3. The effectiveness of a public safety
the camera is dubious* Another alleged controversy over the use of surveillance cameras in public places is that their effectiveness would not have been proven. Although there has been pressure for more video surveillance equipment to be placed in public places, notified in western European countries and the United States of America, because of the threat of terrorist attacks, it is clear that a suicide bomber will not be deterred by the fact that there is a camera on site.
No doubt, crazy, addicted to the effects of powerful drugs and suicide bombers are points of the curve of reasonableness.
They run away from any profile. It is very difficult to be discouraged from their intentions in the presence of a muscular device of cameras and alarms. However, their irregular, atypical behaviours will arouse suspicion with the monitor, since the current software is analytical and ready to verify anomalous procedures, trigger “pop-ups” that identify the individual(s) who is outside the standards of behaviour required by each environment and circumstances.
4. Surveillance through public cameras is
very costly* One of the arguments against the widespread use of surveillance cameras is that it costs a lot of money. Since it wouldn’t be effective or enough to deter crimes, why would we spend a lot of money on it, which not only doesn’t make us safer but also violates our personal rights? *Conclusion*
In today’s world, surveillance cameras can be extremely useful.
Needless to say, putting cameras in strategic areas across the city can help ensure public safety, protect property and prevent
crime. Hong Kong and Singapore, for example, even though cities are low crime figures have thousands of cameras scattered in every corner of high flow.
On the other hand, there are always crimes that are not deterred by surveillance
cameras. *Excessive surveillance cameras in public areas would violate privacy and personal rights*?. So how to balance public safety and privacy?
*The advantages of installing surveillance cameras on public roads far outweigh the disadvantages*.
According to the FBI, an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes, 8,277,829 property crimes, recorded in the U.S. in 2014, and the crime rate has been increasing in recent years. We can’t imagine how bad the situation would be if there were no security cameras on public roads.
